Re:Wladimir and Vitali in the media
von Krazylegs82 Posted at 2009/06/21 04:37
Klitschko free to fight foe of his choice
By Dan Rafael
ESPN.com
Vitali Klitschko is free to make an optional defense of the WBC heavyweight _title_ rather than be forced into a mandatory defense against former titlist Oleg Maskaev after the Swiss-_base_d Court of Arbitration for Sport sided with him in binding arbitration on Friday.
"We won the case. Vitali doesn't have to fight Maskaev," Klitschko advisor Shelly Finkel told ESPN.com from Germany, where he is attending brother Wladimir Klitschko's defense of his version of the _title_ against Ruslan Chagaev on Saturday. "It gives us the opportunity to fight anyone we want. Vitali is a very happy person right now."
After two days of hearings last week and closing statements on Monday, the CAS ruled Friday.
We won the case. Vitali doesn't have to fight Maskaev. It gives us the opportunity to fight anyone we want. Vitali is a very happy person right now.
” -- Vitali Klitschko advisor Shelly Finkel
Although details of the ruling were not released under terms of the settlement, the CAS issued a statement on the case saying, "While the WBC acted in good faith in issuing the order of Dec. 15, 2008, such order, naming Oleg Maskaev as the next mandatory challenger for the WBC world championship in the heavyweight division, exceeded the scope of the WBC's authority... and, for that reason, cannot be enforced against Vitali Klitschko."
"We are absolutely happy," attorney Bruce J. Zabarauskas of Crowell & Moring, which represented Klitschko, told ESPN.com. "We think the arbitrator made the correct decision. We were confident when we commenced the action that we would prevail."
Klitschko returned from a nearly four-year retirement to stop Samuel Peter in October to regain the _title_ and made his first defense March 21 against mandatory challenger Juan Carlos Gomez, knocking him out in the ninth round.
Even before that bout, the WBC had ordered that the winner of Klitschko-Gomez must face Maskaev next. That ruling was made even though Maskaev was a dubious mandatory challenger. He was not the WBC's No. 1-ranked fighter, he had been knocked out by Peter in the sixth round of a lopsided fight to lose the _title_ in March 2008, and his two wins since that loss had come against extraordinarily weak opposition.
Still, the WBC mandated Maskaev get a shot at the winner, to which Klitschko strongly _object_ed. Under the WBC's rules, Klitschko filed a protest in December and eventually his case against the WBC and Maskaev went to the CAS, the body such matters are referred to, under the WBC's rules, for binding arbitration.
The ruling opens the door for Klitschko to set up a fall _title_ defense against the opponent of his choice. One of the leading candidates is American Cris Arreola, whom Klitschko would fight in Los Angeles. It's a fight HBO has high interest in, and it's a match Arreola wants.
"We're ready to fight Klitschko, but it has to make business sense," Arreola promoter Dan Goossen said. "From the aspect of the fighting part, Arreola wants it, we want it, everyone wants it. On the other side of the coin, it has to make sense. It's a big, big fight."
The sides have talked about the possibility of the fight, but Goossen said they didn't negotiate while the case against the WBC and Maskaev played out.
Two other potential candidates are former cruiserweight champion David Haye of England, who was scheduled to fight Wladimir Klitschko on Saturday but withdrew a couple of weeks ago because of a back injury, and _title_holder Nikolai Valuev of Russia.